| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office |  
top_img
Korean J. Pl. Taxon > Volume 56(2); 2026 > Article
TIMOG, GENTALLAN, QUIÑONES-ARRIBADO, PASAMBA, CABARONG, ENDONELA, and BORROMEO: The complete chloroplast genome of Dillenia philippinensis (Dilleniaceae), a near-threatened endemic tree from the Philippines

Abstract

Genomic resources for Dillenia philippinensis Rolfe, a near-threatened tree species endemic to the Philippines, remain limited despite its significant medicinal, culinary, and ornamental uses. Here, we assembled and characterized the first complete chloroplast (cp) genome of D. philippinensis using Illumina sequencing technology. The cp genome exhibited a typical quadripartite structure with a total length of 161,584 bp, consisting of a large single-copy region (89,409 bp), a small single-copy region (19,203 bp), and a pair of inverted repeat regions (26,486 bp each). The plastome contains 36 tRNA genes, eight rRNA genes, and 85 protein-coding genes, with an overall GC content of 36.3%. A total of 299 simple sequence repeat loci were identified, and an inverted repeat boundary comparison indicated a highly conserved structure. A phylogenetic analysis revealed close evolutionary relationships among D. philippinensis, D. turbinata, and D. indica, forming a well-supported monophyletic clade. The generated plastome data provide a valuable genomic resource for species identification, comparative genomics, and phylogenetic studies, and establish a baseline for future conservation genetic research, particularly for this near-threatened species.

INTRODUCTION

Dillenia philippinensis Rolfe, commonly known as the elephant apple, is an important fruit-bearing tree species belonging to the subfamily Dillenioideae of the family Dilleniaceae (Horn, 2009). It typically inhabits wet tropical biomes, particularly primary and secondary forests from lowland areas up to elevations of 2,000 meters (Rugayah and Lemmens, 1995; POWO, 2025). Endemic to the Philippines (Pelser et al., 2011), it is locally referred to as ‘katmon’ and is commonly found growing wild along riverbanks and forested slopes. The species is widely distributed, with documented occurrences across major islands and numerous provinces throughout the country (Barcelo, 2015). Despite its relatively broad distribution, D. philippinensis is currently listed as Near Threatened under criteria B2ab(ii,iii) (Energy Development Corporation, 2020) reflecting ongoing threats that may increase its risk of endangerment without effective conservation measures.
Almost all parts of the plant are traditionally utilized for culinary, medicinal, and ornamental purposes. The locals commonly use its timber for furniture making and light construction, and the sweetish-sour and astringent edible fruit as a souring agent in cooking (Lim, 2011; Artes et al., 2024). Its fruit juice is given orally to relieve fever and cough symptoms, pain in the chest, and for cleaning hair (Macahig et al., 2011; Quattrocchi, 2012). The tree produces phytochemicals, including flavonoids, triterpenoids, and other compounds such as ionones and phenolics, contributing to its various pharmacological activities (Sabandar et al., 2017). It is a source of important bioactive compounds that have antibacterial and chemotherapeutic properties (Yu et al. 2020; Ansari et al. 2021). Also, the tree is widely cultivated for its large leaves and flowers in gardens and urban landscapes (Kerrigan et al., 2011).
Although D. philippinensis holds significant ethnopharmacological (Dayrit et al., 2021), ecological, and economic importance, its complete chloroplast (cp) genome has not yet been reported. To date, only two cp genomes from the genus Dillenia have been published in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (Tan et al., 2019; Li et al., 2021). In this study, we assembled, annotated, and analyzed the first complete cp genome sequence of D. philippinensis to enhance our understanding of this near-threatened species, particularly in terms of its systematics, genetic characteristics, and phylogenetic relationships within the Dilleniaceae family. Furthermore, the genomic data provide valuable baseline information to support future conservation and management efforts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant sampling

The study used disease-free leaves of D. philippinensis collected from a mature tree maintained at the field gene bank of the Crop Breeding and Genetic Resources Division (CBGRD), Institute of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños (UPLB), Laguna, Philippines (14°09′44.6″N, 121°14′46.0″E). A voucher specimen (ICROPS 0102025002) was prepared and deposited in the Philippine Herbarium of Cultivated Plants of the Institute of Crop Science at UPLB (https://cafs.uplb.edu.ph/icrops/, Curator Dr. Renerio P. Gentallan Jr., rpgentallan@up.edu.ph). To confirm and support the taxonomic identification of the specimen archived in the herbarium, morphological characterization was performed using diagnostic traits based on the monograph by Hoogland (1948).

DNA extraction, sequencing, assembly, and annotation of cp genome

Total genomic DNA was extracted from 50 mg of silicadried leaf tissue using a liquid-nitrogen-free cetyltrimethy-lammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol for next-generation sequencing and genome assembly developed by Quiñones et al. (2024). DNA quality was assessed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and concentration and purity were determined using the A260/280 ratio measured on a DeNovix DS-11+ spectrophotometer. A high-quality DNA sample was subsequently submitted to NovogeneAIT Genomics Singapore PTE Ltd. (Singapore) for whole cp genome sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq-PE150 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Raw reads were quality-filtered using Fastp version 0.20.0 (Chen et al., 2018), yielding 29,580,580 clean reads after successive filtering of 150-bp paired-end data. The cp genome of D. philippinensis was assembled using GetOrganelle v1.7.5 (Jin et al., 2020), resulting in a complete circular genome. Assembly parameters followed the recommended settings for embryophyte plastid genomes, utilizing 2 Gb of raw 150-bp paired-end reads. The circularized genome was subsequently annotated using GeSeq (Tillich et al., 2017) and CPGAVAS2 (Shi et al., 2019) using the reference sequence of D. turbinata under the NCBI GenBank accession number NC_062798.1. Visualization of the annotated plastome was performed with OGDRAW (Greiner et al., 2019) and Chloroplast Genome Viewer (CPGView) (Liu et al., 2023) to generate a graphical representation of gene content and genome structure. Then, the complete cp genome sequence was deposited in GenBank under accession number PQ768872.1 at the NCBI. The associated BioProject, BioSample, and Sequence Read Archive (SRA) identifiers are PRJNA1331504, SAMN51604990, and SRR35708821, respectively.

Simple sequence repeat locus analysis

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs), also known as microsatellites, are tandem repeats of nucleotide motifs typically consisting of 1–6 bp repeat units. SSRs identified within the cp genome are referred to as chloroplast SSRs (cpSSRs). Detection of cpSSRs was performed using MISA v1.0 (MIcroSAtellite identification tool; https://webblast.ipkgatersleben.de/misa/) (Beier et al., 2017). The minimum repeat thresholds were set as follows: mononucleotide repeats ≥8, dinucleotide repeats ≥5, trinucleotide repeats ≥3, tetranucleotide repeats ≥3, pentanucleotide repeats ≥3, and hexanucleotide repeats ≥3.

Inverted repeat boundary analysis

The cp genome typically exhibits a circular quadripartite structure comprising a large single-copy (LSC) region, a small single-copy (SSC) region, and two inverted repeat (IR) regions (IRA and IRB), which form four junctions: LSC/IRB, IRB/SSC, SSC/IRA, and IRA/LSC. Expansion and contraction of IR boundaries during genome evolution can result in shifts in gene positions between the IR and single-copy regions. To assess and visualize the contraction and expansion of IR regions, the cp genome of D. philippinensis was compared with those of two closely related Dillenia species using IRscope (Amiryousefi et al., 2018).

Phylogenetic analysis

To infer phylogenetic relationships, the complete cp genomes of D. philippinensis and two congeneric species, D. turbinata and D. indica, were used as the ingroup, with Tetracera sarmentosa (Yang et al., 2022) included as the sister group within the family Dilleniaceae. Three additional species: Vitis californica (Wen et al., 2018), Sabia yunnanensis (Sun et al., 2015), and Macadamia ternifolia (Liu et al., 2017) served as outgroups. Taxon selection was guided by previous phylogenetic studies of Dilleniaceae (Horn, 2009). Complete plastome sequences of all seven species were retrieved from GenBank and aligned using MAFFT v7.4 (Katoh and Standley, 2013). The alignment was not partitioned and no additional trimming was applied given the high conservation and quality of the sequences. Phylogenetic reconstruction was performed using the maximum likelihood method under the best-fit substitution model (GTR + G) (Nei and Kumar, 2000) implemented in MEGA v11.0.13 (Tamura et al., 2021). MEGA was used for its reliable implementation of maximum likelihood analyses and ease of bootstrap testing. Node support was assessed using 1,000 bootstrap replicates.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Morphological characteristics of the plant material

Dillenia philippinensis is a tree with fissured bark (Fig. 1A), elliptic leaves alternately arranged, 10–15-nerved, 19–26 × 9–15 cm, chartaceous, with obtuse, often slightly acuminate apex, obtuse base, and slightly dentate margin (Fig. 1D, E); petiole is 2–5 cm long, with half-elliptic, 1–3 mm broad, caducous wings (Fig. 1C). The inflorescences are racemes, mostly terminal; flower ca. 10–15 cm in diameter (Fig. 1F); sepals 5, inner three longer than the outer two (Fig. 1G); petals 5, white, 6–9 × 5–7 cm (Fig. 1H); stamens in 2 distinct groups, the outer ones yellow, the inner ones purplish, with their apex reflexed in bud (Fig. 1Ib–Ie); carpels 10–12, with linear, ca. 17 mm long, spreading styles, each with 10–12 ovules. The fruit is indehiscent, depressed-globose, 4–5 cm high, 5–6 cm diam. including the enclosing slightly fleshy sepals; carpels are slightly spirally twisted, fleshy, 1–2-seeded (Fig. 1Jb). The seeds are 5 × 3 mm, very finely echinate, at the base enclosed by a 2 mm long, membranaceous aril (Fig. 1K). These diagnostic features are consistent with previous descriptions (Hoogland, 1948) and support the taxonomic identity of the sampled specimen (ICROPS 0102025002, Fig. 2), in agreement with its plastome-based phylogenetic placement.

Genome content and organization

The first cp genome of D. philippinensis was successfully sequenced and assembled. It had a generally high and uniform sequencing depth, with an average coverage of 555.8× (Fig. 3), supporting a reliable and well-resolved assembly. The depth and evenness of sequencing coverage are key indicators of genome assembly quality (Jenke et al., 2025). Although coverage varied across regions, lower depths are likely attributable to GC bias or polymerase chain reaction inefficiencies, whereas elevated coverage in repetitive regions, such as the IRs typical of cp genomes, reflects increased read redundancy. Minor fluctuations in coverage are consistent with the stochastic nature of sequencing processes (Benjamini and Speed, 2012). The assembled cp genome of D. philippinensis exhibited the typical quadripartite structure observed in other Dillenia species (Fig. 4). The complete plastome has a total length of 161,584 bp, which is longer than that of D. indica (159,266 bp) (Tan et al., 2019) but shorter than D. turbinata (163,250 bp) (Li et al., 2021). It comprises an LSC region (89,409 bp), a SSC region (19,203 bp), and a pair of IR regions (IRA and IRB: 26,486 bp each). The overall GC content of the cp genome was 36.3% with base compositions of 31.4% A, 18.4% C, 17.8% G, and 32.3% T. However, the GC contents in its three regions (SSC, LSC, and IR) differ significantly; GC content is the highest in the IR region at 42.8%, followed by the LSC region at 33.8%, and the SSC region has the lowest GC content at 29.6% (Table 1).

Gene composition

A total of 129 functional genes were found (Table 2), comprising 36 tRNA genes, eight rRNA genes, and 85 protein-coding genes. These include 44 genes for photosynthesis, 29 genes for self-replication, six other genes (accD, ccsA, cemA, clpP, infA, and matK) and six conserved ORFs (ycf1, ycf15 (×2), ycf2 (×2), and ycf4). Furthermore, a total of 13 cis-splicing genes were identified, of which nine (rps16, atpF, rpoC1, ycf3, clpP, petB, petD, rpl16, and ndhA) were unique and two (rpl2 and ndhB) were duplicates (Fig. 5A) and rps12 is a trans-splicing gene (Fig. 5B). The complete cp genome sequence was deposited in GenBank under the accession number PQ768872.1, with associated BioProject, SRA, and Bio-Sample numbers of PRJNA1331504, SRR35708821, and SAMN51604990, respectively.

SSR locus analysis

A total of 299 SSR loci were identified in the cp genome (161,584 bp), including 85 compound SSRs (Fig. 6). The detected SSRs ranged from mono-to hexanucleotide repeat types, with shorter repeats being more common. Mononucleotide repeats were the most abundant, comprising 181 loci (60.54%), and were largely dominated by A/T motifs (177), while C/G repeats were rare (4). Trinucleotide repeats were the second most frequent (99; 33.11%), followed by dinucleotide repeats (13; 4.35%). Tetranucleotide, pentanucleotide, and hexanucleotide repeats were present in very low numbers, with 4 (1.34%), 1 (0.33%), and 1 (0.33%) loci, respectively. Overall, SSR frequency decreased as repeat length increased. The strong predominance of A/T-rich mononucleotide repeats is consistent with typical cp genomes and has been widely reported in previous plastome studies (Liu et al., 2021; Lubna et al., 2025). These patterns are often attributed to replication slippage and the inherent AT-rich nature of cp DNA (Golchini and Soorni, 2026). The identified SSRs may serve as useful molecular markers for future studies on genetic diversity, species identification, and phylogenetic analysis (Khade et al., 2025).

IR boundary analysis among three Dillenia species

The expansion and contraction of IR regions are recognized as major driving forces in the evolution of land plant plastomes (Xiong et al., 2009). In this study, we compared the positions of the LSC/IR junction (JL) and the IR/SSC junction (JS) across three Dillenia plastomes (Fig. 7). The lengths of the IR regions were relatively conserved, ranging from approximately 26,457 to 26,497 bp, indicating high conservation with only minor contraction/expansion among the three Dillenia plastomes. The JL (IR-LSC: rpl22 & rps19) boundary showed a generally similar pattern across the three plastomes, with slight variation in the positioning of the rps19 gene. At the IR-LSC boundary, rps19 extended into the IR region by approximately 47 bp in D. indica, 22 bp in D. turbinata, and 3 bp in D. philippinensis, indicating small shifts associated with IR boundary dynamics. The JS (IR-SSC: ycf1 & ndhF) boundaries were also largely conserved among the Dillenia plastomes. The ndhF gene extended into the IRB region by approximately 11 bp in D. indica, 32 bp in D. philippinensis, and 57 bp in D. turbinata, while the remaining portion of the gene was located in the SSC region. At the JSA (SSC-IRA) boundary, the ycf1 gene crossed the SSC/IR boundary in all species and extended into the IR region, with IR-located segments measuring approximately 1,136 bp in D. indica, 1,129 bp in D. philippinensis, and 1,129 bp in D. turbinata. The total length of ycf1 within the SSC region ranged from 4,529 to 4,537 bp across the species. At the JLA (IRA/LSC) boundary, the intergenic spacer between the boundary and the trnH gene (located in the LSC region) varied among species, decreasing from 107 bp in D. indica to 58 bp in D. philippinensis and 19 bp in D. turbinata. These results indicate that the plastomes of Dillenia species are highly conserved in structure, with minor IR expansion observed, particularly in D. turbinata, contributing to slight genome size variation among species.

Phylogenetic analysis

The reconstructed maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on available whole cp genomes revealed a close evolutionary relationship among D. philippinensis, D. turbinata, and D. indica, which together form a well-supported monophyletic clade, with Tetracera sarmentosa as their sister group (Fig. 8). These results are consistent with previous studies on the infrafamilial relationships of Dilleniaceae, in which Tetracera, the only pantropical genus in the family, is sister to all other Dilleniaceae, as inferred from plastid loci (Horn, 2009). However, certain limitations should be noted. The present analysis relies solely on cp genome data, and taxon sampling remains limited due to the scarcity of complete plastome sequences within Dilleniaceae. Future studies incorporating broader taxon sampling and additional genomic datasets will be essential to further resolve and refine phylogenetic relationships within the family. Nevertheless, this study provides a new plastome sequence for the genus Dillenia, contributing to an improved understanding of evolutionary relationships within the Dilleniaceae family. The generated plastome data also represent a valuable genomic resource for future studies in species identification and comparative genomics. Moreover, these data establish a useful baseline information for downstream conservation genetic research, particularly for threatened taxa such as D. philippinensis, by facilitating the development of SSR markers and enabling population genetic analyses (Hu et al., 2024).

NOTES

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Fig. 1
Morphological characteristics of D. philippinensis. A Bark. B terminal bud. C twig showing petiolar wing (PW) and leaf scar (LS). D adaxial side of the leaf. E abaxial side of the leaf. F Flower showing five petals. G sepals. H petals. Ia flower, top view. Ib flower, side view showing stigma (Stg) and stamen (Sta). Ic stamens, top view. Id stamens, side view with gynoecium (Gy). Ie individual stamens. Ja fruit. Jb fruit showing persistent styles. Jc fruit cross-section. K seed.
kjpt-56-2-148f1.jpg
Fig. 2
Herbarium specimen of D. philippinensis (voucher number: 0102025002) deposited at Herbarium of Cultivated Plants (ICROPS).
kjpt-56-2-148f2.jpg
Fig. 3
Sequencing depth and coverage map of the chloroplast genome assembly of D. philippinensis. The horizontal axis represents the base position along the plastome, while the vertical axis indicates the sequencing depth at each corresponding position.
kjpt-56-2-148f3.jpg
Fig. 4
The circular map of D. philippinensis chloroplast genome, generated by OGDraw. Genes belonging to different functional groups are indicated in distinct colors. The inner circle represents the structural regions of the chloroplast genome: inverted repeat A (IRA), inverted repeat B (IRB), large single-copy (LSC), and small single-copy (SSC) regions. The gray line plot depicts the GC content variation along the genome.
kjpt-56-2-148f4.jpg
Fig. 5
Schematic maps of cis-spliced genes (A) and the trans-spliced gene (B) (rps12) in the chloroplast genome of D. philippinensis.
kjpt-56-2-148f5.jpg
Fig. 6
The chloroplast simple sequence repeat of D. philippinensis.
kjpt-56-2-148f6.jpg
Fig. 7
Comparison of LSC, SSC, and IR border regions of three Dillenia species. The genes around the borders are shown above the mainline. The JLB, JSB, JSA, and JLA represent junction sites of LSC/IRB, IRB/SSC, SSC/IRA, and IRA/LSC, respectively.
kjpt-56-2-148f7.jpg
Fig. 8
Phylogenetic tree reconstructed using maximum-likelihood (ML) method based on complete chloroplast genome sequences of D. philippinensis and two other Dillenia species with Tetracera samentosa as the sister group, and Vitis californica, Sabia yunnanensis, and Macadamia ternifolia as the outgroup taxa. The numbers above the lines represent ML bootstrap values. The following sequences were used: Dillenia philippinensis PQ_768872.1 (this publication), Dillenia turbinata NC_062798.1 (Li et al., 2021), Dillenia indica NC_042740.1 (Tan et al., 2019), Tetracera sarmentosa NC_065058.1 (Yang et al., 2022), Vitis californica MG664836.1 (Wen et al., 2018), Sabia yunnanensis NC_02943.1 (Sun et al., 2015), and Macadamia ternifolia NC_036416.1 (Liu et al., 2017). Scale bar refers to evolutionary distance.
kjpt-56-2-148f8.jpg
Table 1
Base composition of the chloroplast genome of D. philippinensis.
Region A (%) T (%) C (%) G (%) GC (%) Length (bp)
Chloroplast genome 31.4 32.3 18.4 17.8 36.3 161,584
Small single-copy region, SSC 35.2 35.1 15.4 14.2 29.6 19,203
Large single-copy region, LSC 32.3 33.9 17.3 16.5 33.8 89,409
Inverted repeated region A, IRA 28.5 28.7 22.2 20.6 42.8 26,486
Inverted repeated region B, IRB 28.7 28.5 20.6 22.2 42.8 26,486

SSC, short single-copy; LSC, long single-copy; IR, inverted repeat.

Table 2
Genes in the chloroplast genome of D. philippinensis.
Gene function classification Group of genes No. of genes Gene name
Photosynthesis Subunits of photosystem I 5 psaA, psaB, psaC, psaI, psaJ
Subunits of photosystem II 14 psbA, psbB, psbC, psbD, psbE, psbF, psbI, psbJ, psbK, psbM, psbN, psbT, psbZ, ycf3
Subunits of NADH dehydrogenase 12 ndhA, ndhB (×2), ndhC, ndhD, ndhE, ndhF, ndhG, ndhH, ndhI, ndhJ, ndhK
Subunits of cytochrome b/f complex 6 petA, petB, petD, petG, petL, petN
Subunits of ATP synthase 6 atpA, atpB, atpE, atpF, atpH, atpI
Large subunit of rubisco 1 rbcL
Self-replication Proteins of large ribosomal subunit 11 rpl14, rpl16, rpl2 (×2), rpl20, rpl22, rpl23 (×2), rpl32, rpl33, rpl36
Proteins of small ribosomal subunit 14 rps11, rps12 (×2), rps14, rps15, rps16, rps18, rps19, rps2, rps3, rps4, rps7 (×2), rps8
Subunits of RNA polymerase 4 rpoA, rpoB, rpoC1, rpoC2
Other genes Maturase 1 matK
Protease 1 clpP
Envelope membrane protein 1 cemA
Acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 accD
c-type cytochrome synthesis gene 1 ccsA
Translation initiation factor 1 infA
Unknown function Conserved hypothetical chloroplast ORF 6 ycf1, ycf15 (×2), ycf2 (×2), ycf4

LITERATURE CITED

Amiryousefi, A., Hyvönen, J. and Poczai, P. 2018. IRscope: An online program to visualize the junction sites of chloroplast genomes. Bioinformatics 34: 3030-3031.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Ansari, S. S., Diño, P. H. Castillo, A. L. and Santiago, L. A. 2021. Antioxidant activity, xanthine oxidase inhibition and acute oral toxicity of Dillenia philippinensis Rolfe (Dilleniaceae) leaf extract. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacognosy Research 9: 846-858.
crossref
Artes, L. A., Wagan, A. M. Omana, M. E. and Tamisin, L. L. Jr 2024. Postharvest characterization and storage of fresh katmon fruit (Dillenia philippinensis). The Philippine Agricultural Scientist 107: 196-202.
crossref
Barcelo, R. 2015. Phytochemical screening and antioxidant activity of edible wild fruits in Benguet, Cordillera Administrative Region, Philippines. Electronic Journal of Biology 11: 80-89.

Beier, S., Thiel, T. Münch, T. Scholz, U. and Mascher, M. 2017. MISA-web: A web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics 33: 2583-2585.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Benjamini, Y. and Speed, T. P. 2012. Summarizing and correcting the GC content bias in high-throughput sequencing. Nucleic Acids Research 40: e72.
crossref pmid pmc
Chen, S., Zhou, Y. Chen, Y. and Gu, J. 2018. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34: i884–i890.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Dayrit, F. M., Guidote, A. Madulid, D. A. Villasenor, I. Sia, I. C. Macahig, R. A. S. Tan, M. and Agoo, E. 2021. Encyclopedia of Medicinal Plants of the Philippines. 3: Philippine Institute of Traditional and Alternative Health Care (PITAHC), Manila.

Energy Development Corporation (EDC) 2020. Dillenia philippinensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T33202A68069633.

Golchini, M. M. and Soorni, A. 2026. Structural and phylogenetic insights from complete chloroplast genomes of seven Vicia species. PLoS ONE 21: e0340630.
crossref pmid pmc
Greiner, S., Lehwark, P. and Bock, R. 2019. OrganellarGenome-DRAW (OGDRAW) version 1.3.1: Expanded toolkit for the graphical visualization of organellar genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 47: W59–W64.
crossref pmid pmc
Hoogland, R. D. 1948. Dilleniaceae. Flora Malesiana-Series 1, Spermatophyta 4: 141-174.

Horn, J. W. 2009. Phylogenetics of Dilleniaceae using sequence data from four plastid loci (rbcL, infA, rps4, rpl16 intron). International Journal of Plant Sciences 170: 794-813.
crossref pmid
Hu, L., Wang, J. Wang, X. Zhang, D. Sun, Y. Lu, T. and Shi, W. 2024. Development of SSR markers and evaluation of genetic diversity of endangered plant Saussurea involucrata. Biomolecules 14: 1010.
crossref pmid pmc
Jenke, N., Smith, G. M. Magar, B. T. and Gruenstaeudl, M. 2025. Variation of and associations with the depth and evenness of sequencing coverage in archived plastid genomes. Scientific Reports 15: 26294.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Jin, J.-J., Yu, W.-B. Yang, J.-B. Song, Y. dePamphilis, C. W. Yi, T.-S. and Li, D.-Z. 2020. GetOrganelle: A fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biology 21: 241.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Katoh, K. and Standley, D. M. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772-780.
crossref pmid pmc
Kerrigan, R. A., Craven, L. A. and Dunlop, C. R. 2011. Dilleniaeae. Flora of the Darwin Region. Northern Territory Herbarium, Department of Natural Resources, Environment, the Arts and Sport, Short, P. S. and Cowie, I. D. (eds.), Palmerston.

Khade, Y. P., Mainkar, P. Chandanshive, A. Rai, K. M. Sinhasane, S. R. Jadhav, M. Patil, A. Hembade, V. L. Radhakrishna, A. More, S. J. Khar, A. Bhandari, H. R. Gupta, A. J. Kale, R. B. Prakash, K. and Mahajan, V. 2025. Harnessing chloroplast SSRs to decipher genetic diversity in underutilized Allium species. Frontiers in Plant Science 16: 1645145.
crossref pmid pmc
Li, F., Xie, X. Huang, R. Tian, E. Li, C. and Chao, Z. 2021. Chloroplast genome sequencing based on genome skimming for identification of Eriobotryae Folium. BMC Biotechnology 21: 69.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Lim, T. K. 2011. Edible Medicinal and Non-medicinal Plants. Vol 2. Fruits. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht. Pp. 416-418.

Liu, J., Niu, Y. F. Ni, S. B. He, X. Y. and Shi, C. 2017. Complete chloroplast genome of a subtropical fruit tree Macadamia ternifolia (Proteaceae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resources 2: 738-739.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Liu, S., Wang, Z. Su, Y. and Wang, T. 2021. Comparative genomic analysis of Polypodiaceae chloroplasts reveals fine structural features and dynamic insertion sequences. BMC Plant Biology 21: 31.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Liu, S., Ni, Y. Li, J. Zhang, X. Yang, H. Chen, H. and Liu, C. 2023. CPGView: A package for visualizing detailed chloroplast genome structures. Molecular Ecology Resources 23: 694-704.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Lubna, , Jan, R. Hashmi, S. S. Asif, S. Bilal, S. Waqas, M. Abdelbacki, A. M. M. Kim, K.-M. Al-Harrasi, A. and Asaf, S. 2025. The first complete chloroplast genome of spider flower (Cleome houtteana) providing a genetic resource for understanding Cleomaceae evolution. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26: 3527.
crossref pmid pmc
Macahig, R. A. S., Matsunami, K. and Otsuka, H. 2011. Chemical studies on an endemic Philippine plant: Sulfated glucoside and seco-A-ring triterpenoids from Dillenia philippinensis. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 59: 397-401.
crossref pmid
Nei, M. and Kumar, S. 2000. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Pp. 333 pp.

Pelser, P. B., Barcelona, J. F. and Nickrent, D. L. 2011. Co’s digital flora of the Philippines. Retrieved Jul. 11, 2025, available from: https://www.philippineplants.org/Families/Dilleniaceae.html.

POWO 2025. Plants of the World Online. Retrieved Jun. 28, 2025, available from: https://powo.science.kew.org/.

Quattrocchi, U. 2012. CRC World Dictionary of Medicinal and Poisonous Plants: Common Names, Scientific Names, Eponyms, Synonyms, and Etymology (5 Volume Set). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Pp. 3960 pp.

Quiñones, K. J. O., Gentallan, R. P. Jr Timog, E. B. S. Vera Cruz, A. JR Macabecha, C. G. A. Papa, I. A. Coronado, N. B. Bartolome, M. C. B. Ceribo, D. B. Madayag, R. E. Magtoltol, J. B. Sienes, R. K. A. Alvaran, B. B. S. and Borromeo, T. H. 2024. Liquid-nitrogen-free CTAB DNA extraction method from silica-dried specimens for next-generation sequencing and assembly. MethodsX 12: 102758.
crossref pmid pmc
Rugayah, R. H. and Lemmens, M. J. 1995. Dillenia philippinensis Rolfe. Plant Resources of South-East Asia No. 5(2): Timber trees; Minor Commercial Timbers. Retrieved Jun. 28, 2025, available from: https://edepot.wur.nl/411166.

Sabandar, C. W., Jalil, J. Ahmat, N. and Aladdin, N.-A. 2017. Medicinal uses, chemistry and pharmacology of Dillenia species (Dilleniaceae). Phytochemistry 134: 6-25.
crossref pmid
Shi, L., Chen, H. Jiang, M. Wang, L. Wu, X. Huang, L. and Liu, C. 2019. CPGAVAS2, an integrated plastome sequence annotator and analyzer. Nucleic Acids Research 47: W65–W73.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Sun, Y., Moore, M. J. Zhang, S. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, D. E. Zhao, T. Meng, A. Li, X. Li, J. and Wang, H. 2015. Phylogenomic and structural analyses of 18 complete plastomes across nearly all families of early-diverging eudicots, including an angiospermwide analysis of IR gene content evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 96: 93-101.
crossref pmid
Tamura, K., Stecher, G. and Kumar, S. 2021. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38: 3022-3027.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Tan, X.-H., Wang, J.-H. Zhao, K.-K. Zhu, X. and Wang, H.-F. 2019. Complete plastome sequence of Dillenia indica Linn. (Dilleniaceae): An Endangered (EN) species in South China. Mitochondrial DNA B Resources 4: 55-56.
crossref pmid pmc
Tillich, M., Lehwark, P. Pellizzer, T. Ulbricht-Jones, E. S. Fischer, A. Bock, R. and Greiner, S. 2017. GeSeq: Versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 45: W6–W11.
crossref pmid pmc
Wen, J., Harris, A. Kalburgi, Y. Zhang, N. Xu, Y. Zheng, W. Ickert-Bond, S. M. Johnson, G. and Zimmer, E. A. 2018. Chloroplast phylogenomics of the New World grape species (Vitis, Vitaceae). Journal of Systematics and Evolution 56: 297-308.
crossref pdf
Xiong, A.-S., Peng, R.-H. Zhuang, J. Gao, F. Zhu, B. Fu, X.-Y. Xue, Y. Jin, X.-F. Tian, S. Zhao, W. and Yao, Q.-H. 2009. Gene duplication, transfer, and evolution in the chloroplast genome. Biotechnology Advances 27: 340-347.
crossref
Yu, GFBRC, Cabrera, R. Bueno, P. R. P. and Sia, I. C. 2020. The in vitro antioxidant activity and phytochemicals of locally consumed plant foods from Quezon Province, Philippines. Acta Medica Philippina 54: 151-160.
crossref pdf
Editorial Office
Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy
Department of Biology, Daejeon University, Daejeon 34520, Korea
TEL: +82-42-280-2434   E-mail: kjpt1968@gmail.com
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Society of Plant Taxonomists.                 Developed in M2PI